Property Division After Divorce in Lithuania: Legal Rules Explained (2026 Guide)
- Veranika Rusakovich
- 5 days ago
- 19 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
In Lithuania, property division after divorce is based on the distinction between joint matrimonial property and personal property. As a general rule, assets acquired during marriage are considered jointly owned, while assets owned before marriage, or received by gift or inheritance, usually remain personal. However, division is not strictly automatic or equal. Courts assess each case individually, taking into account the nature of the assets, financial contributions, debts, and family circumstances.
Divorce in Lithuania involves not only the breakdown of a relationship but also the reorganisation of financial arrangements built during the marriage. For many individuals, it becomes one of the most significant financial turning points in their lives. Disputes most often arise around how property, savings, and liabilities should be divided.
A common misconception is that all assets are split equally between spouses. In reality, Lithuanian law applies a more detailed framework. Certain assets may remain individually owned, equal division is not guaranteed in every case, and financial obligations — including debts — may also form part of the overall settlement.
Legal overview under Lithuanian law
This guide is based on the provisions of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania and explains how financial matters are resolved following divorce. It covers:
How courts evaluate financial and non-financial contributions
How liabilities are distributed between the parties
What rights may arise in relation to the family home
When a financial claim between spouses may be brought
The legal framework is designed to achieve a fair outcome, taking into account both financial realities and the circumstances of each case — particularly where one party is in a weaker economic position or where children are involved.
For more information about legal assistance in these matters, please refer to our family law services.
This guide covers:
What is matrimonial (joint) property in Lithuania? · What is separate property in divorce cases? · Pre-marital assets and financial remedy claims · Mortgage payments, renovations and improvements · How debts are treated on divorce · Second pillar pension funds on divorce · What happens to the family home · Protection of the weaker party and children's interests · Negotiated settlement vs court proceedings · Key evidence · FAQ and glossary
Quick answer: Under Article 3.88 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania — property acquired during the marriage is treated as joint matrimonial property and is subject to division on divorce. Assets held before the marriage, together with property received by gift or inheritance, are treated as personal property and are ordinarily not subject to division. Equal division is the starting point, not a guaranteed outcome.
Key points to note
Property acquired during the marriage is ordinarily treated as joint matrimonial property
Pre-marital assets, gifts, and inherited property may remain the personal property of the owning spouse
Debts and liabilities may also fall within the scope of financial settlement proceedings
Registration of an asset in one spouse's name does not, of itself, determine its legal status
A financial remedy claim may arise where joint funds were applied towards the other spouse's separate property
A negotiated settlement is frequently the faster and more cost-effective route compared with contested court proceedings
Is property always divided equally on divorce in Lithuania?
In brief: Under Article 3.88 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, equal division is the starting point — not an automatic entitlement. The court retains discretion to depart from equal shares having regard to the origin of the assets, each party's contributions, any outstanding liabilities, the welfare of dependent children, and all other material circumstances.
What is matrimonial property in Lithuania?
In brief: Under Article 3.88 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, all property acquired during the marriage is treated as jointly owned by both spouses — irrespective of whose name it is registered in or whose income was used to acquire it.
Property officially held in one spouse's name may still be treated as part of the joint estate if it was obtained during the marriage from joint funds.
Joint matrimonial property ordinarily includes:
Real property acquired during the marriage (flats, houses, land)
Motor vehicles purchased during the marriage
Savings held in bank accounts
Investments, securities, and business interests
Employment income and other earnings received during the marriage
Any other movable or immovable property acquired from joint funds
Practical note: A flat purchased during the marriage and registered solely in one spouse's name may nonetheless be treated as joint matrimonial property if it was acquired using joint income. Registration in one name alone is not determinative.
Important: The fact that an asset is registered in one spouse's name does not, of itself, determine its legal status on divorce.
What is separate property in Lithuanian divorce cases?
In brief: Separate property — comprising assets owned before the marriage, together with gifts and inherited property — is generally not subject to division on divorce.
Not all assets formed during or before the marriage are treated as part of the matrimonial estate. Under Lithuanian law, a clear distinction is made between joint property and separate property, which usually remains with the spouse who owns or received it.
Categories typically treated as separate property
Separate assets generally include:
Assets acquired before marriage — such as real estate, savings, or vehicles owned before the wedding
Gifts — property given specifically to one spouse during the marriage
Inherited assets — property or funds received through inheritance, regardless of when it was received
Individually funded acquisitions — assets demonstrably purchased using exclusively personal funds rather than joint resources
When classification may become disputed
Although the legal principle is relatively clear, in practice the distinction between separate and joint property is often contested. Issues commonly arise where:
Mortgage payments on pre-marital property were made from shared income
Renovation or improvement works were funded from joint savings
The value of separate property increased due to both spouses’ financial or practical contributions
Legal consequence
In such situations, the originally separate nature of the asset may be challenged. Courts may then consider whether one spouse is entitled to a financial adjustment or compensation reflecting their contribution to the property’s value or maintenance.
Pre-marital property and financial compensation claims
Issues involving assets acquired before marriage are among the most common — and often the most legally intricate — in financial settlement proceedings.
A typical example involves one spouse entering the marriage as the sole owner of a flat. During the relationship, both spouses may live in that property, use joint income to cover mortgage payments, invest shared funds into renovations, and contribute to its upkeep over time.
In such circumstances, the non-owning spouse may not acquire a direct ownership interest in the property itself. However, they may still have a valid claim for financial compensation, reflecting the extent of their financial and practical contributions during the marriage.
Courts will assess these contributions carefully to determine whether, and to what extent, a compensatory award is justified.
What contributions may give rise to a financial remedy claim?
Mortgage repayments made from joint income
Renovation or reconstruction costs funded from joint assets
Utility and maintenance costs paid from joint funds over a sustained period
Improvement works that materially increased the market value of the property
A claim is not automatic. It must be advanced, substantiated, and supported by evidence. The court will assess the nature, duration, and benefit of the contributions made.
Please note: Financial remedy claims of this kind must be grounded in documentary evidence.
Insight from Advocate Vincentas Zabulis: If you resided in and made financial contributions to a property belonging to your spouse, do not assume you have no legal recourse. Equally, if you are the property owner and your spouse is pursuing such a claim, its merits will turn entirely on what can be established by documentary evidence.
How is a mortgaged property treated on divorce, and what happens to the outstanding loan?
This question arises in two distinct contexts: contributions made towards a spouse's separate property, and contributions one spouse seeks to have recognised within the joint matrimonial estate.
Improvement works and renovations
Improvement works are frequently the most significant category. Renovations that materially enhance the value of a property — a new roof, structural works, a full refurbishment — confer a tangible financial benefit on the property owner. Where such works were funded from joint savings or one spouse's income, a financial remedy claim is well-founded.
Key evidence in such cases:
Bank statements evidencing transfers or withdrawals corresponding to renovation costs
Contracts and invoices from contractors, suppliers, or tradespeople
Receipts for materials and labour
Valuation reports prepared before and after the works
Correspondence between the parties confirming the works and the source of funding
The earlier the relevant documentation is gathered and organised, the stronger the legal position.
Mortgage payments made from joint income
In some cases, a mortgage may be registered in the name of only one spouse, either because the property was acquired before the marriage or for financial reasons during it. However, if the loan was serviced using income shared by both parties, the non-owning spouse may be entitled to have that contribution recognised.
This becomes particularly relevant where the property is formally classified as separate. Even without legal ownership, payments made from joint resources reduce the outstanding loan balance and increase the overall equity in the property, which may give rise to a financial claim.
How courts may assess such contributions
When determining whether compensation is appropriate, the court will typically consider:
The proportion of repayments made from joint funds
The length of time over which those payments were made
The extent to which the mortgage payments increased the property’s equity
Each case is assessed individually, but the underlying principle remains that financial contributions from shared resources may create a compensatory entitlement, even in respect of property owned by one spouse alone.
Utilities and maintenance costs
Routine maintenance and utility expenditure do not, of themselves, ordinarily provide a sufficient basis for a financial remedy claim — though it may be relevant in assessing the overall contribution of one spouse to the other's separate property.
How are debts divided upon divorce?
In brief: Debts incurred for family purposes are treated as joint liabilities, regardless of which spouse signed the agreement. Debts taken on for personal ends are treated as that spouse's personal responsibility.
Financial settlement proceedings cover not only assets but also outstanding obligations. Under Lithuanian law, the key factor is not solely whose name appears on a credit agreement, but the purpose of the borrowing and how the funds were actually used. This distinction is often underestimated during early stages of divorce discussions.
Joint and personal liabilities
Debt classification primarily depends on its purpose and connection to family life.
Obligations incurred to support the household — such as purchasing or maintaining the family home, covering everyday expenses, or financing shared transport — are usually regarded as joint responsibilities, even where only one spouse formally agreed.
By contrast, debts arising from purely individual activities, unrelated to family needs, are typically treated as the sole responsibility of the spouse who incurred them.
In reality, financial arrangements are not always clear-cut. A single loan may have been used for both family and personal purposes. In such cases, courts examine financial records and factual evidence to determine an appropriate allocation.
Consumer credit and credit card balances
Credit facilities and card balances accumulated during the marriage may also be included in the financial settlement, where they were used for household or family-related expenses.
Courts may assign responsibility for specific debts between spouses based on usage patterns and contribution, but such an allocation does not automatically affect obligations towards external creditors.
Important: Before entering into any financial settlement, it is essential to have a clear and complete picture of all outstanding liabilities — not just assets. An agreement that divides assets without resolving the position on debts may leave one party exposed to significant financial risk.
What happens to the family home after divorce in Lithuania?
The mortgage is often the largest and most significant liability in divorce proceedings, and it raises several practical and legal issues.
Important: A divorce settlement between the spouses does not alter the contractual relationship with the creditor.
In situations where one spouse retains the property together with the associated mortgage, the other spouse may still remain legally responsible if repayments are not maintained. This risk must be properly managed, typically through refinancing, formal lender consent, or other protective arrangements.
Where the property is sold, the mortgage is normally repaid from the sale proceeds, and any remaining equity is divided between the parties in accordance with the settlement terms.
Second pillar pension funds on divorce
Pension assets are frequently overlooked in divorce proceedings. Under Article 3.88 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, contributions made to a second pillar pension fund from employment income during the marriage are treated as joint matrimonial property — regardless of whose name the account is held in.
Key principles:
Contributions made before the marriage → separate property
Contributions made during the marriage from joint income → joint matrimonial property
The fund itself is not physically divided — division is effected by way of financial compensation
You can read more about this in our article: Second-Pillar Pension Fund and Divorce in Lithuania: What You Need to Know
Commonly overlooked assets
Many parties concentrate on real property and savings, failing to account for other assets that may fall within the matrimonial pool:
Second pillar pension funds — contributions made during the marriage are treated as joint matrimonial property
Business interests and shareholdings — company shares or securities acquired during the marriage may be brought within scope
Investment accounts — investments accumulated from joint income during the marriage
Liabilities — debts, not merely assets, may be subject to division
Financial remedy claims — arising from contributions to a spouse's separate property (renovation works, mortgage repayments)
Overseas assets — property acquired abroad during the marriage may also fall within the scope of proceedings
Need assistance with your situation?
What happens to the family home?
The family home may be sold and proceeds divided, or transferred to one spouse with compensation to the other. In cases involving children, courts may prioritise housing stability when making decisions.
Important: Where the home was purchased during the marriage, both spouses have a claim to it, even if it is registered in one name only. Where the home was owned by one spouse before the marriage, it is generally treated as separate property — though a financial remedy claim may nonetheless be available.
Purchased during the marriage — ordinarily, joint matrimonial property, irrespective of whose name it is registered in. Both spouses hold an interest in it.
Owned by one spouse before the marriage — ordinarily separate property. However, where joint funds were applied to mortgage repayments, renovation works, or material improvements, the other spouse may have grounds for a financial remedy claim.
Where dependent children reside in the property, the court may have regard to the children's welfare, housing stability, and the arrangements for their primary care when determining how the property is to be dealt with and how the estate is to be divided.
Following divorce, one spouse may seek a right of continued occupation — particularly where dependent children are involved. The legal basis and terms of any such arrangement will depend on the specific circumstances of the case.
In practice, resolution typically involves one spouse buying out the other's interest, or a sale with division of the net proceeds. Where agreement cannot be reached, the matter is determined by the court.
Practical example: division where one spouse owned property before marriage
One spouse purchased a flat before marriage for €100,000. During the marriage, the couple invested €40,000 of joint funds into renovating the property and increasing its value. By the time of divorce, the flat is worth €180,000.
How the court may approach this case
The legal analysis may distinguish between personal ownership and joint investment:
Initial value of €100,000 — remains the personal property of the original owner
€40,000 invested during marriage — treated as joint matrimonial contribution
Increase in value linked to improvements — may also be considered jointly attributable
Possible outcome
The court may recognise that:
The owning spouse retains the base value of €100,000
The €40,000 investment is divided equally → €20,000 each
Part of the added value (from €140,000 to €180,000) may also be shared, depending on доказательства (evidence of improvements vs market growth)
Important note
This type of case is more complex than standard asset division. Courts will assess:
whether the increase in value resulted from joint efforts or market conditions
the extent of financial and non-financial contributions
supporting documentation (contracts, invoices, expert valuations)
The key principle remains: even personally owned property may be partially shared if joint resources significantly increase its value.
Protection of the weaker party: right of occupation, usufruct, and children's interests
In brief: The court may grant additional protection to the financially weaker party, having regard to their financial position and the welfare of any dependent children.
Lithuanian law recognises that divorce does not affect both spouses equally. Where there is a material imbalance — in financial resources, housing options, or caring responsibilities — the legal framework provides certain protections. This is particularly relevant where dependent children are involved.
Right of continued occupation of the family home
Even where the family home is legally owned by one spouse or forms part of the joint matrimonial estate, the other spouse may have grounds to seek a right of continued occupation following divorce. This is particularly relevant where:
Dependent children reside in the property, and their primary care arrangements are with the spouse seeking continued occupation
The spouse seeking continued occupation has no alternative housing and limited financial means
Immediate vacation of the property would cause disproportionate hardship
Where one parent remains in the family home with dependent children and has no realistic prospect of securing alternative accommodation in the short term, the court may consider the question of occupation rights having regard to the children's welfare, housing stability, and the parties' actual financial positions. Such a right does not transfer ownership — but may, in certain circumstances, give rise to a temporary or time-limited occupation arrangement.
Usufruct
In certain circumstances, a usufruct — the right to use and derive benefit from property owned by another — may be relevant in the context of divorce proceedings. A usufruct may provide a structured basis for one spouse to remain in occupation of the property on defined terms and for a defined period, pending resolution of the ownership question or whilst dependent children are being raised.
The role of children in financial settlement decisions
The existence of dependent children does not, in itself, dictate how assets are divided upon divorce. However, it is an important consideration that courts may weigh carefully, especially when determining arrangements involving the family home.
When assessing financial outcomes, the court may take into account:
the need to maintain stable living conditions for the children
each parent’s realistic ability to obtain suitable alternative housing
the potential consequences of selling the home or requiring relocation
existing arrangements regarding where the children live and how contact with the other parent is maintained
While children’s interests do not override all other factors, they often influence practical decisions, particularly where housing and day-to-day stability are concerned.
For a more detailed explanation of child maintenance obligations in Lithuania, including how financial support is calculated, see our separate guidance on this topic.
The financially weaker spouse
Where one spouse has significantly fewer financial resources — for example, because they reduced their working hours during the marriage to care for children — the court may take this into account. Non-financial contributions to the family — childcare, household management, supporting the other spouse's career — are recognised as relevant to the overall assessment.
Important: If you are the parent with whom the children's primary residence has been established, or if you are in a materially weaker financial position than your spouse, it is essential that these circumstances are clearly articulated in the proceedings. They are legally relevant and may influence both the financial settlement and the practical housing arrangements following divorce.
Can the parties reach a financial settlement without going to court?
Yes — and in many cases, a negotiated settlement is the more practical and cost-effective route.
The parties may negotiate and agree on how to divide assets and allocate liabilities. Such an agreement may cover all aspects of the matrimonial estate: real property, personal property, savings, debts, and financial remedy claims.
Where divorce proceedings are before the court, a financial settlement agreement may be submitted for judicial approval as part of the process. In certain circumstances, a notarial route is also available.
Advantages of a negotiated settlement:
Speed — avoids protracted litigation
Cost — reduces legal fees and court costs
Control — the parties determine the outcome
Privacy — the terms remain outside the public record
Flexibility — the agreement can be tailored to the family's specific circumstances
Any agreement must be properly drafted and legally sound. A poorly drawn agreement, or one that fails to address all material issues, may give rise to further disputes. In some cases, mediation may assist the parties in reaching an agreement.
How does a marriage contract affect financial settlement?
Where the spouses have concluded a marriage contract, the standard rules governing division of assets on divorce may be significantly modified. Such agreements can determine in advance how property is owned, whether certain assets remain separate, and how division should be carried out in the event of divorce.
In most cases, the terms of a valid marriage contract will prevail over default statutory principles. However, courts retain the ability to examine the agreement if there are disputes concerning its interpretation, fairness, or legal validity.
When does a financial dispute proceed to court?
Not all divorces involve contested financial litigation, and many are resolved by agreement between the parties. However, court involvement becomes necessary in situations such as:
disagreement between spouses regarding the division of property or debts
disputes over whether an asset should be classified as joint or separate
allegations that one party has hidden or failed to disclose assets
conflicting valuations of property, businesses, or financial interests
claims relating to contributions made to a spouse’s separate property
issues affecting dependent children, particularly in relation to housing arrangements
disagreements over responsibility for debts and their purpose
What if a spouse is concealing assets?
Where there is credible concern that one party has not fully disclosed their financial position, the court may require additional documentation or order disclosure of specific records.
In more urgent cases, interim protective measures may be requested, including asset freezing orders or restrictions preventing the disposal of property. Early legal intervention is often essential in such situations to prevent the dissipation of assets before judgment.
Division of property where one spouse lives or works abroad
Cross-border family situations are increasingly common, particularly among Lithuanian nationals living between Lithuania and countries such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, or Germany.
Several key principles apply in such cases:
Assets located in different jurisdictions
Where assets are held in multiple countries — for example, real estate in Lithuania and financial accounts abroad — each asset is typically governed by the legal framework of the country where it is situated. A Lithuanian court may deal with domestic assets, while foreign assets may require separate proceedings or recognition abroad.
Foreign income and savings
Income earned abroad during the marriage is generally treated as part of the joint matrimonial pool if it contributed to family finances. Savings and assets acquired from such income may therefore fall within the scope of the division.
Jurisdiction and residence
Jurisdiction is usually determined by the spouses’ habitual residence. Where both parties reside in Lithuania, Lithuanian courts will generally hear the case. However, where one spouse lives abroad, jurisdiction may become a contested preliminary issue.
Practical recommendation: Where a case involves international elements — such as foreign income, property in multiple countries, or relocation between jurisdictions — early legal advice is strongly recommended. This helps prevent asset transfers or legal actions that may complicate or limit future claims.
What evidence carries the most weight?
In financial proceedings following divorce, evidence is pivotal. The outcome will often depend not merely on what happened, but on what can be properly demonstrated and supported by documentation.
Type of Evidence — Why It Matters
Title deeds and Land Registry records — confirm legal ownership and the date of acquisition
Bank statements and transfer records — demonstrate the source of funds used to purchase or enhance assets
Loan and mortgage documentation — clarify who entered into the obligation, its purpose, and how repayments were made
Invoices and receipts — evidence expenditure on renovation works and property improvements
Proof of financial contributions — supports a financial remedy claim relating to investment in a spouse's separate property
Valuation reports — establish the current or historic value of assets
Correspondence — emails, messages, or letters confirming financial arrangements or contributions
Pre-marital asset documentation — supports the classification of an asset as separate property
It is advisable to start collecting and organising relevant documentation at an early stage — ideally before formal proceedings are initiated.
Why early legal advice matters
Financial settlement in divorce cases requires a combination of legal interpretation, fact assessment, and strategic planning. The financial consequences can be long-term, potentially affecting housing arrangements, economic stability, and ongoing liability exposure for many years after the divorce is finalised.
Seeking advice at an early stage allows individuals to approach the process with greater clarity and control over potential outcomes.
Early legal guidance can help you to:
Gain a clear understanding of your legal entitlements and potential financial exposure
Identify possible financial claims that may not be immediately obvious
Evaluate the strength of your position before making strategic decisions
Negotiate more effectively from a fully informed standpoint
Reduce the risk of procedural mistakes that could negatively impact your case
Safeguard your position in relation to outstanding debts and third-party obligations
Even in situations where both parties intend to resolve matters amicably without court involvement, early legal input helps ensure that any agreement reached is fair, properly structured, and legally enforceable in the long term.
If you are facing divorce in Lithuania and have concerns regarding property division, housing arrangements, financial obligations, or potential financial claims, obtaining early legal guidance can help reduce risk and clarify your position from the outset.
An initial legal assessment can assist in understanding your rights, identifying potential issues in advance, and avoiding decisions that may negatively affect your financial outcome.
For tailored advice based on your specific circumstances, you may contact Zabulis Legal to discuss your case in more detail.
FAQ: Divorce and Property Division in Lithuania
What types of assets are divided during divorce in Lithuania?
Assets acquired during the marriage are generally considered matrimonial property. Assets owned before marriage, as well as gifts and inheritances, are typically treated as personal property.
Is property always divided 50/50 in Lithuania?
Property is not automatically divided equally. Equal division is the general starting principle for matrimonial assets, but the outcome depends on the nature of the property, claims of the parties, debts, children’s interests, and other relevant circumstances. A 50/50 split is a guideline rather than a guaranteed result.
Is pre-marital property divided on divorce?
Assets acquired before marriage are usually treated as separate property and remain with the original owner. However, disputes may arise where joint funds were used for mortgage payments, renovations, or significant improvements during the marriage.
Is pre-marital, gifted, or inherited property divided in divorce?
Inherited or gifted assets are generally classified as separate property. However, each case is assessed individually, and disputes may arise where marital funds or joint efforts were later invested in such property.
How are debts divided in Lithuanian divorce proceedings?
Yes, debts related to family needs may be shared between spouses. Courts will assess whether a liability was incurred for household purposes or for the personal benefit of one spouse. Importantly, third-party creditors are not automatically bound by divorce settlement terms.
What if a property is registered only in one spouse’s name?
Registration alone does not determine ownership classification. Courts will examine when and how the property was acquired and whether joint funds or contributions were used.
Can a spouse claim compensation for improvements made to the other spouse’s property?
Yes. A compensation claim may arise where one spouse has contributed financially, physically, or otherwise to improving property owned by the other spouse, provided this can be supported with evidence.
Can spouses divide assets by agreement in Lithuania?
Yes. In many cases, spouses may agree on the division of assets without court intervention. Such agreements must be properly documented and, where required, formalised or approved through the appropriate legal process to be enforceable.
What evidence is useful in property disputes during divorce?
Key evidence includes:
property ownership documents
bank transfers and financial records
loan agreements
invoices and receipts for renovations
proof of deposits or contributions
property valuation reports
Do children affect property division in Lithuania?
Yes. The presence and interests of minor children may be relevant, particularly when deciding issues related to the family home and post-divorce living arrangements.
Can mortgage payments made from joint funds be compensated?
Yes. Where mortgage payments for property owned by one spouse were made using joint income, the other spouse may have grounds for a compensation claim reflecting their financial contribution.
Can a spouse remain in the family home after divorce?
In certain cases, particularly where minor children are involved, the court may allow one spouse to continue using the family home even if it is owned by the other spouse or forms part of matrimonial property.
Glossary
Matrimonial property – assets acquired during the marriage, ordinarily subject to division on divorce.
Separate property – assets owned before the marriage, or received by way of gift or inheritance, are ordinarily not subject to division.
Financial remedy claim – a legal claim by one spouse for compensation reflecting funds or contributions invested in the other spouse's separate property.
Joint liabilities – debts incurred during the marriage for family purposes, which may be subject to division alongside assets.
Financial settlement agreement – an agreement between the parties on the division of assets and liabilities, which may be submitted for judicial approval or formalised before a notary.
Usufruct – the right to use and derive benefit from property owned by another person, on defined terms.
This article provides general information on the legal framework in Lithuania. The outcome in any individual case depends on the specific facts, the evidence available, and how claims are presented. This article does not constitute legal advice.
Legally reviewed by: Advocate Vincentas Zabulis.
Keywords
#DivorceInLithuania #DivorceProcess #FamilyLawSolicitor #DivorceLaywers #DivisionOfAssets #Divorce #Separation #MarriageContract #PropertyDivision #MatrimonialProperty #SeparateProperty #DivorceAndAssets #FinancialSettlementOnDivorce #FamilyLawLithuania
Comments